Comments on: Sparkle GeForce GTX 260 Plus 1792MB Video Card Review

By: lewislau

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:56:38 +0000

i agree, that testing on a larger resolution should have been included. Perhaps, you could have not been so harsh in your comments though.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:55:04 +0000

Yea, it's a pretty good card, and sad to see it go.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:52:32 +0000

good for higher resolutions

Peter — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:31:47 +0000

IMO 1792MB of memory is bit much.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:56:38 +0000

i agree, that testing on a larger resolution should have been included. Perhaps, you could have not been so harsh in your comments though.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:55:04 +0000

Yea, it's a pretty good card, and sad to see it go.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:52:32 +0000

good for higher resolutions

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:56:38 +0000

i agree, that testing on a larger resolution should have been included. Perhaps, you could have not been so harsh in your comments though.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:55:04 +0000

Yea, it's a pretty good card, and sad to see it go.

lewislau — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:52:32 +0000

good for higher resolutions