Sparkle GeForce 210 1GB Video Card Review

Installation

Test Rig:
Intel Atom 330 processor
ASRock A330ION nVidia MCP7A-ION Mini-ITX Motherboard
Thermaltake Element Q Mini-ITX case w/220 watt PSU
Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit

I wish I had an off-the-shelf rig to use for a test rig, but I didn’t have one available. This board has integrated geForce 9400 graphics, so I thought it might be interesting to compare the 210 to the newest geForce integrated graphics. Another interesting aspect is that during testing I found the Atom’s “processing power” to be similar to that of an AMD Athlon 64 3200+, the cutting edge technology of five years ago. You may laugh, but I saw some HP rigs on the shelf with that very processor just last year. So placing this video card in my Atom rig, which I found to be pretty weak in the graphics department, is a logical move.

Installation is the easiest, just pop it in a PCI-E x16 slot, no additional power needed. nVidia’s recommdation is a minimum 300 watt power supply, but as the Atom draws a max of 8 watts, rather than the 50-130 watts that most CPUs are I felt that power supply should have plenty of power.

Testing
Since neither the GeForce 210 nor the integrated graphics are intended for extreme 3D gaming, I saw no need to run any gaming benchmarks other than Futuremark. I ran Cinebench10 more as a control to make sure that the other performance of the system was not affected by the video card.

cinebench10

3dmark06

pcmarkv

10 comments
  1. Fairly pointless really, you have made no mention about HTPC – probably the main reason for purchasing this card. What about bluray performance? 1080p? Audio over HDMI?

    needs more beef.

  2. Fairly pointless really, you have made no mention about HTPC – probably the main reason for purchasing this card. What about bluray performance? 1080p? Audio over HDMI?

    needs more beef.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *