<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowepro Flipside 200 Camera Backpack Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/</link>
	<description>The Place that&#039;s All About Computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivorhughes</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4264</link>
		<dc:creator>ivorhughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=167#comment-4264</guid>
		<description>I bought a Lowepro Flipside 200 and received it today 10 March 2010.  I had travelled to the camera show at NEC to have a look at their backpacks side by side - I also bought a Pro Trekker 400.  The 200 I received had obviously not been through any kind of quality control - it was seriously under width.  Despite Lowepro&#039;s claims about it being large enough for one DSLR with 80-200 zoom - plus 1-3 extra lenses or flash units - I couldn&#039;t even get the camera and lens in there.  Additional items were out of the question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lowepro had no UK reps available when I called and Lowepro US flatly refused to give me the email address of their customer services department - and it&#039;s not online either.  Their claims about any commitment to quality and customer service are questionable.  I doubt if they bother looking at the stuff being churned out in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a Lowepro Flipside 200 and received it today 10 March 2010.  I had travelled to the camera show at NEC to have a look at their backpacks side by side &#8211; I also bought a Pro Trekker 400.  The 200 I received had obviously not been through any kind of quality control &#8211; it was seriously under width.  Despite Lowepro&#39;s claims about it being large enough for one DSLR with 80-200 zoom &#8211; plus 1-3 extra lenses or flash units &#8211; I couldn&#39;t even get the camera and lens in there.  Additional items were out of the question.</p>
<p>Lowepro had no UK reps available when I called and Lowepro US flatly refused to give me the email address of their customer services department &#8211; and it&#39;s not online either.  Their claims about any commitment to quality and customer service are questionable.  I doubt if they bother looking at the stuff being churned out in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=167#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=167#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2252</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=167#comment-2252</guid>
		<description>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/lowepro-flipside-200-camera-backpack-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=167#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this case is pretty good considering most camera bags, are carry over one shoulder. This backpack style is much better for your back / posture. Good thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

