<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition Processor Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/</link>
	<description>The Place that&#039;s All About Computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-822</guid>
		<description>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are behind a lot in the enthusiasts market. None of their proc. can compare to the mighty i7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-821</guid>
		<description>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes up for the Phenom I debacle however AMD is not behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-820</guid>
		<description>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewislau</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-phenom-ii-x4-940-black-edition-processor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>lewislau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkcomputers.org/new/?p=440#comment-819</guid>
		<description>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An improvement, from the lacklustre phenom I series good job amd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

